He made some art and these are some pictures of it

boohooboo:

i had an art show here are some pictures of it

























this is where my older brother and i sat for the duration of the show

he told me about the time my father attacked him in the night and he found himself incapable of fighting back. i told him about the hallucinations i had as a child



and some comics


navajo bixby - moonlighting

Reblogged from boohooboo

The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time.

— Tom Cargill

http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/?title=Why_Haskell_matters&oldid=24286#Haskell_vs_OOP

The only thing Haskell does not provide is a way to group functions and data together into a single “object” (aside from creating a data type which includes a function - remember, functions are data!). This is, however, a very minor problem. To apply a function to an object you would write “func obj a b c” instead of something like “obj.func a b c”.

IMHO, this is not a minor thing.

Just Testing Syntax Highlighting

So let’s see, does it work?

#include <stdio.h>

int main() {
  printf("Hello, World!\n");
  return 0;
}

Seems like it does! Got this from Theocacao

advocating Java as your paragon of static typing is like trying to introduce people to authentic Mexican food by taking them to Taco Bell.

— Avdi

My study of various other programming languages, static and dynamic, object-oriented and functional, compiled and interpreted, has lead me to realize that Ruby is indeed and excellent language and that Java is not.

I see the value in powerful type systems such as those in Scala or Haskell, but I’m not sure I’m willing to trade in my metaprogramming license just yet…

Remake of the office space printer destruction scene => http://bit.ly/mVpw6

Looks like there is going to be a Scala Conf in Reston, VA on Oct. 30: http://bit.ly/scala-lift-off-reston

Bill the Lizard: Programming and Logic Puzzles →